Prized advice

Mefford CCA MFAJason Worthington, MFA senior staff agronomist, left, presents Jason Mefford, Crop-Trak area sales manager, with a plaque for being named Missouri's 2019 Certified Crop Adviser of the Year.MFA Crop-Trak Area Sales Manager Jason Mefford was named the 2019 Missouri Certified Crop Adviser of the Year Dec. 17 during the University of Missouri Crop Management Conference in Columbia, Mo.

The award is designed to recognize a crop consultant who delivers exceptional customer service, is highly innovative, shows leadership and contributes substantially to the exchange of ideas and trans­fer of agronomic knowledge within Missouri’s agricultural industry.

“Jason takes pride in his CCA certification and the code of ethics it stands for,” said MFA Senior Staff Agronomist Jason Worthington, who serves as chairman of the Missouri CCA board. “He’s not only one of the most skilled con­sultants I’ve been around, he is also a valuable resource for other Crop-Trak consultants he mentors, instilling those values and working diligently to train them with the agronomic knowledge they need. He has coached several employees who stepped up in the compa­ny and is responsible for a lot of their success.”

The Certified Crop Adviser program is coordinated through the American Society of Agronomy. To become certified, a candidate must have two years of crop production experience and a bachelor’s degree in agronomy or at least four years of post-high school experience, pass a CCA state and international exam as well as sign a code of ethics. CCAs must earn continuing education credits to remain certified.

“Jason exemplifies the CCA program with his internal motivation and desire to learn new things,” Worthington said. “To get certified, you not only have to have agronomic expertise but also real-world experience and commitment to customers. You are expected to continue learning throughout your career and stay involved with changes in the industry. Jason is never satisfied not knowing the answer and seeks out knowledge constantly.”

Mefford, who earned his CCA designation in 2013, began his MFA career as an intern working with crop consultants to scout fields. Within a year he joined MFA full time as a crop consultant and now serves in a re­gional agronomist role, supervising four other crop con­sultants in west central Missouri. Together, they scouted more than 45,000 acres in 2019, assisting around 60 growers with pest management, fertility, variety place­ment and scouting other field issues.

“My main goal is the do the best we can for the grower, agronomically, economically and environ­mentally,” said Mefford, who also holds the Certified Professional Agronomist, 4R Stewardship and Resistance Management Specialty designations. “We measure our success as consultants by the success of our growers.”

Worthington added that the values of the CCA program mirror MFA’s core values of customer partnering, steward­ship, innovation and technology, honesty and integrity. That’s why out of Missouri’s nearly 300 certified crop advisers, MFA employs 75 of them.

“We expect any of our employees who make grower recom­mendations to have their CCA certification,” Worthington said. “That not only includes crop consultants but also precision specialists, key account managers, applicators and store man­agers. Even our livestock specialists are CCAs because they deal with forages—one of our region’s major crops. It’s an important program for agriculture and valuable to growers, and I hope it instills confidence that MFA is doing the right thing.”

  • Created on .
  • Hits: 3733

Stewards of the land

The old saying goes, “good help is hard to find.” We post open po­sitions for custom applicators on a weekly basis across MFA’s territory. There is no doubt it is a demanding position. Seasonally, these individ­uals put in long hours, working dawn to dusk many days and sac­rificing time with their families for their customers.

The job doesn’t just take hard work and time. With new products continually coming on the market, applicators have to keep up with agronomic knowledge and technol­ogy, both chemical and otherwise. Using some of these technologies, they try to ensure they’re not only taking care of MFA’s customers but also that customer’s neighbors.

With programs and apps to tell the most up-to-date wind condi­tions, where gardens are planted and where bee hives reside, they have tremendous responsibility to be stewards of the land. One of MFA’s core values is stewardship. It makes custom applicators account­able to ensure conditions are right to do a responsible, quality job.

This past year, MFA partnered with State Technical College of Mis­souri in Linn, Mo., to create a pro­gram that provides students with hands-on training and education in the field. After working one-on-one with our experienced professionals, these internships can move to full-time positions upon graduation.

MFA also hosts annual trainings to update our applicators on the latest in spraying techniques, herbi­cide systems and new crop protec­tion technology. At MFA, we pride ourselves on doing good work.

Though “good help is hard to find,” we find it. Annually, it’s my pleasure to recognize top custom applicators in each of our five regions for their excellence and commitment to MFA’s core values of honesty and integrity, accountability, team spirit, innova­tion and technology, stewardship and customer partnering. Year after year, these employees get the job done, and I’m proud of these talented folks.

Region 1: Tim SpickardRegion 1

MFA Agri Services, Trenton, Mo.
Years of Service: 7
Annual Acres: About 15,000

Trenton Agri Services Manager Dustin Cox said, “Tim treats each application as if he were taking care of his own crops. He takes pride in spraying. Most of our customers request Tim when they need spray­ing done.” Spickard typically runs a Rogator for the location, though he performs optimally in any piece of equipment, Cox added. Spickard is also an avid supporter of the local 4-H and FFA chapters, helping the organizations with functions and supporting his nieces and nephews who are members of both. “His workmanship is something special that’s hard to find these days,” Cox continued. “He’s willing to do any­thing we need to help our operation run smoothly, and he does it profes­sionally.” When Spickard isn’t work­ing, he enjoys spending time with his friends and family and riding his Harley Davidson motorcycle.

Region 2: Tyler AllenRegion 2

MFA Agri Services, Centralia, Mo.
Years of Service: 8
Annual Acres: About 35,000

Centralia Agri Services Manager Jim Gesling said, “Tyler has consistently provided quality application and good stewardship to every field he applies. Tyler is very conscientious and takes a true interest in our cus­tomers’ fields. He does a tremendous job of treating each field as his own.” Allen is a team player and talented mechanic, Gesling added. These attributes make him an exceptional asset to his location and MFA as a whole. Outside of work, Allen is ac­tive in his church. “I am very proud of this young man,” Gesling said.

Region 3: Andrew Hanke Region 3

MFA Agri Services, Salisbury, Mo.
Years of Service: 5
Annual Acres: About 14,000

“Andrew always takes the time and effort to make sure he is doing a quality job,” Assistant Manager Mike Lampe said. “During spray­ing season, Andrew always has his sprayer ready to go first thing in the morning no matter how late he ran the night before. He works holidays and weekends if needed, and we appreciate his dedication.” Hanke also runs the location’s NH3 application machine when needed. He always covers the whole field and monitors field and weather conditions to ensure he’s doing a quality job, Lampe added. Hanke’s hobbies are hunting and fishing. He also helps his father and uncle on the family’s cattle and row-crop operation.

Region 4: David BlackmonRegion4

MFA Midsouth, Piggott, Ark.
Years of Service: 4
Annual Acres: About 17,000

“David takes pride in his work,” said Steve McChristian, MFA Piggott branch manager. “He stays late to make sure the job is complete and has a good relationship with all the growers.” Blackmon’s equipment is always ready to go, clean and well maintained, McChristian added, and he helps fellow operators whenever possible. “He is very proficient at his job, setting an example for others,” McChristian said. In his off hours, Blackmon helps raise money for school backpack programs and for less-fortunate children at Christmas. He also builds benches and picnic tables in memory of community members who have passed away. His hobbies are raising calves and wood­working. “He’s a family man above all,” McChristian said.

Region 5: Dustin ClarkRegion 5

MFA Lamar Group, Irwin, Mo.
Years of Service: 5
Annual Acres: About 20,000

Serving as both bulk plant manag­er and applicator, Dustin Clark is willing to take on any job, District 8 Manager Jared Hyder said. He works long hours to ensure custom­ers receive the best service possible and makes sure the machines are serviced and ready at all times, Hy­der added. “Dustin isn’t just a great applicator,” Hyder said. “He is also key in getting the ground pile filled during harvest at Lamar. He helps with any task necessary to help MFA and our customers be success­ful.” When Clark is not working hard for MFA, he is spending time with his two children. In addition, he enjoys working on old cars and fishing.

  • Created on .
  • Hits: 1801

White mold takes hold in Missouri

Year in and year out, soybean growers across Missouri and sur­rounding states have no shortage of pests. In 2019, in addition to nor­mal challenges, weed control was more difficult due to compressed windows for timely herbicide ap­plication. On the other hand, insect and disease pressure was lower than expected. That’s not to say that many growers did not benefit from measures taken to control insects and diseases. However, 2019 may be one to remember due to an emerg­ing threat that gained a foothold in our area: white mold.

For two consecutive years, this fungal disease has been detected in northwest and central Missouri. Perhaps the most serious late-sea­son soybean disease in much of the upper Midwest, white mold pro­liferates in cool, moist conditions, dense canopies and high-yield envi­ronments. Yield losses are estimated at 2 to 5 bushels for every 10% of plants infected with the disease. White mold infections can com­monly exceed 50% in areas where the disease is well established. It overwinters as sclerotia in the soil and persists for long periods, making crop rotation ineffective at reducing disease potential.

Scouting for white mold is more difficult than foliar diseases. The first sign of white mold develop­ment is not on the plant but on the soil. Overwintering sclerotia devel­op into mushroom-like structures called apothecia. These structures appear at or near canopy on the soil and produce spores that infect the soybean plant.

The second sign of development is lesions below the soybean nodes where white, fluffy mycelial growth occurs, giving white mold its name. The mold appears after spores from the apothecia infect the soybean plants through the flowers.

The last symptoms are the most visible—wilting of soybean leaves and plant death—but these issues show up far too late to indicate the need for treatment.

Being primarily a stem disease, white mold is difficult to control with fungicides. Disease hiding deep within the soybean canopy is difficult to reach. Further com­pounding the issue is the fact that many fungicides that control foliar diseases are ineffective against white mold, making product selection critical. Common fungicide prac­tices to control white mold are a triazole application at R1 (early flowering) followed by another application at R3.

To ensure fungicide applications are effective, first understand that not all triazoles are created equal. Certain products are much more effective against white mold than others. Selecting a fungicide active ingredient is just as important as choosing the class of chemistry. In­cluding the herbicide Cobra at the R1-R2 application of fungicide will improve white mold control. Cobra activates systemic acquired resis­tance in soybeans, which means it sensitizes the plants to white mold and allows them to trigger defense mechanisms quicker.

Other management practices for white mold often have to be incorporated with chemical control to be effective. Chief among those is canopy management. While lush, dense canopies provide several ben­efits for weed control, they provide an ideal home for white mold to develop and a physical barrier be­tween the disease and applied fun­gicides. Fields with known histories of white mold are best suited for 30-inch rows, allowing fungicides to cover the stems more effectively and air flow to slow white mold progression.

Similarly, variety selection becomes important, not just for plant resistance but also plant architecture. While bush-type varieties are often considered more desirable than pole-type soybeans, the opposite is true if white mold management is a driving factor. A pole variety provides fewer branch­es, more upright growth and less canopy cover.

Prevention is one of the best management plans for white mold, especially without widespread infes­tations. Sclerotia can be transported from field to field, by tillage equip­ment and combines, in residue and in soil. Thorough equipment cleaning between fields may be worthwhile.

While we don’t know to what extent we will have to deal with white mold in the future, we do know it now resides in Missouri. Going forward, control starts with a good integrated pest management plan, considering all practices and the threat level of a particular field. It’s paramount to understand the bi­ology of the pest to include cultural, biological and chemical strategies at the appropriate time. Our biggest challenge as new pests develop is to understand the limitation of our current control systems and determine when something new needs to be incorporated. Increasing understanding of white mold is the first necessary step

  • Created on .
  • Hits: 2873

Conservation on rented land

Farmers care for the land because it cares for them, and stewardship is even more ingrained in multigenera­tional farms. When making deci­sions on our farm, I always default to what I remember about my dad. He used no-till back in the ’80s and ’90s. He ensured there were areas for quail to thrive on the edges of the fields where he and I could chase them in the fall. Agriculture today doesn’t look the same, and many growers are farming acres with­out certainty they will be farming them next year, much less the next generation. As land ownership has changed, around 41% of U.S. farm­land is farmed by someone other than the owner. In some regions, the figure can grow up to 80%.


Conservation practices are typically more numerous and easier to exe­cute on our own farms. Why is that? The one decision-maker doesn’t have to convince others that the ideas are sound. With leased land, there is a level of communication and personal relationships to maintain in the farm decision process. Human nature is to avoid conflict, and many growers are afraid to take management decisions requiring a financial investment to landowners. They’re afraid the land­owner will balk at the cost and rent the land to someone else. On the flip side, many landowners look to their growers for insight on what needs to happen on their farm. That need for advice can get ignored in all the conflict avoidance.

The solution is to form a partner­ship based on mutual goals. During the process of leasing land, look for not just the farm itself but for some­one who aligns with your priorities and management style. If you as a grower typically manage a certain way, convey that to the landowner and be sure they are comfortable with your style. Conversely, if landowners want a grower to no-till and carefully watch soil loss on their farms, try to choose someone who already does these practices on their other acres. If you are expecting someone to do things differently on your farm from the rest of his opera­tion, it may not be a good fit.


Having a written lease is essential. You can only be sure you are protect­ed financially if you have something in writing that explicitly conveys who is responsible for what. We wouldn’t join together in a corporate partnership with nothing in writing, so why would we do so for a farm lease agreement? It’s a great oppor­tunity to force an in-person meeting at least once a year to discuss farm management decisions. During these conversations, come prepared with soil tests, yield maps, etc., to discuss fertility inputs or the need for edge-of-field practices. Show the land­owner how you have invested in the farm and how you can help maintain and improve production over the next few seasons. As a landowner, ask questions about production and what areas are difficult for your grower to access or turn a profit.


Be sure you form a working part­nership. Data suggests that the longer the partnership, the better the stewardship activities on that farm. Productive discussions from growers and landowners ensure you are making the farm more profitable for both parties. Some areas may need significant fertility builds to achieve top yields needed to turn a profit in the current ag economy. Work with landowners and explain that some of those nutrients are banked in the soil, which belongs to them. To solidify your credibility, involve a third party such as MFA to write a nutrient management plan or ana­lyze previous soil test results.

The same goes for field edges or other unproductive areas where those nutrient inputs aren’t likely to pay off. Involve someone who can guide the landowner through the process to obtain financial assis­tance to convert acreage to wildlife habitat or grazing land. Be sure to offer to help with the implementa­tion of new permanent seedings as some landowners may not have the necessary equipment. This is truly a win-win as the landowner gets income from those acres, and the lessee no longer pays rent on acres that don’t turn a profit.

Don’t hesitate to contact me to discuss how MFA can help build partnerships with landowners and promote stewardship of working land in our trade territory.

  • Created on .
  • Hits: 1985

Nitrogen modeling shows its value in tough year

What do you think of when you hear the term, “nutrient stewardship?” Increased regulations? Reduced cost? More efficient fertility? Or does it simply mean “doing the right thing?”

This past year, MFA offered a nitrogen tool that modeled nitrogen loss and helped producers and agronomists make educated decisions on an acre-by-acre basis. Usage of the tool grew from 30,000 acres in 2018 to 160,000 acres in 2019. Talk about a year to launch a tool for nitrogen loss! We had record rainfall at the wrong time. We experienced prolonged periods of saturated soils that ultimately caused us to lose higher-than-normal amounts of nitrogen in some areas. 

What did we gain from this tool?

While this tool does allow us to export VRT (variable rate technology) recommendations to load in the spreader, what we found was that nitrogen modeling gave us some insights to soil type, production practices and weather—to name a few. This model uses several layers to predict nitrogen loss. While the tool isn’t the gospel, it does start the conversation around nutrient stewardship, allowing us to make sure we are taking care of the crop while not overapplying or underapplying nitrogen.

What are the results?

The combines started rolling the first week of September in our southern area and will continue harvesting for a while. We expect to see a greater NUE (nitrogen use efficiency) where the model’s recommendations were followed, but time will tell. The ultimate determining factor will be ROI. What can this tool and many others do to the bottom line for your operation? We have looked at and tested these and many others throughout the past couple seasons, but never in a year with this much moisture and with saturated soils for this long. These are some of the questions we will address as we collect data from our research sites. 

What other nitrogen issues are we facing?

Every spring I get asked if we need to protect our anhydrous with a stabilizer. And the answer is, “yes.” This year was a great case study for why you need to protect NH3 with an effective stabilizer. I’ve been in fields that had spring-applied anhydrous ammonia with and without the nitrogen stabilizer, N-Serve, and, boy, a visual difference was apparent. The truth will come when combines roll across the field. Same with top dress. We need to make sure we are protecting our urea with N-Guard, which contains nBPT to combat volatilization, or by using Super-U, which has both nBPT and dicyandiamide (DCD) to protect nitrogen above and below ground.

Other factors to consider?

I’ve traveled across our trade area and have seen fields that look great next to fields that have plenty of cover—from cover crops to just natural cover of weeds, mainly waterhemp and marestail. This will provide many other challenges that I will discuss another time. However, one topic that I do want to cover is the amount of erosion I’ve witnessed this year. While we all know this wasn’t a normal year and hope we don’t see this again, we can learn from these challenges. Some of the observations that I took away was the color of water runoff from many of the fields. I had the opportunity to see fields with and without cover crops, tillage versus no-till, etc. There a big difference. Where cover crops were planted and no-till was used, there was little to no color in the water leaving the field, while tilled fields were another story. On the other hand, tilled fields with cover crops still had loss of soil, but it was significantly reduced compared to the no-cover tilled fields. It doesn’t take a rocket scientist to figure out what needs to be done. 

When developing a nutrient stewardship plan, keep in mind it is a living plan that will need to be adjusted when weather events, crop failures or other obstacles get thrown your way. Reach out to your local MFA to make a plan today.

  • Created on .
  • Hits: 2863

About Today's Farmer magazine

Today's Farmer is published 9 times annually. Printed issues arrive monthly except combined issues for June/July, August/September and December/January. Subscriptions are available only in the United States.

If you would like to begin or renew a print subscription, CLICK HERE and go to our shop. We are proud to offer the subscription for only $15 per year.

 ©2021 MFA Incorporated.

Connect with us.