Top Blog Posts

  • A release from the USDA:

    The USDA's Natural Resources Conservation Service is accepting and processing applications for enrollment in the Conservation Stewardship Program (CSP), the nation’s largest conservation program. Applications will be made available in local service centers.

    NRCS has made several updates to the program this year to help producers better evaluate their conservation options and the benefits to their operations and natural resources. New methods and software for evaluating applications will help producers see up front why they are or are not meeting stewardship thresholds, and allow them to pick practices and enhancements that work for their conservation objectives. These new tools also allow producers to see potential payment scenarios for conservation early in the process.

    “This year, the Conservation Stewardship Program provides even more opportunities for conservation and greater flexibility at the local level to prioritize resource concerns and conservation approaches,” says NRCS Chief Jason Weller. “State and locally customized CSP tools will improve the customer experience during application evaluations.”

    NRCS offices will begin processing applications for the program on November 14, 2016, with sign-up running through February 3, 2017. People interested in the additional opportunities the updated CSP will offer can find information on the new CSP portal, located at www.nrcs.usda.gov/csp. This one-stop shop, which provides information to help producers determine whether CSP is right for them, will be continually updated as more information becomes available. Changes that producers can expect to see include nearly double the enhancements and conservation practices offered and better reporting tools to tell producers the results of their conservation efforts on their land.

    Through CSP, agricultural producers and forest landowners earn payments for actively managing, maintaining, and expanding conservation activities like cover crops, ecologically-based pest management, buffer strips, and pollinator and beneficial insect habitat – all while maintaining active agriculture production on their land. CSP also encourages the adoption of cutting-edge technologies and new management techniques such as precision agriculture applications, on-site carbon storage and planting for high carbon sequestration rate, and new soil amendments to improve water quality.

    NRCS has addressed producer and stakeholder input requesting greater flexibility to address local resource concerns. Now, NRCS will more effectively utilize input from farmers, ranchers and partners in State Technical Committees and local workgroups to inform and expand conservation strategies under the program. Producers will be better prepared to apply because they will know these local ranking priorities and targeted resource concerns in advance.

    CSP is for producers who are already established conservation stewards, helping them to deliver multiple conservation benefits on working lands, including improved water and soil quality and enhanced wildlife habitat. Information about CSP, including national and state ranking questions and enhancement descriptions, is available at www.nrcs.usda.gov/csp. Producers interested in the program should visit their local USDA Service Center to submit an application.

     

     

  • U.S. Farmers & Ranchers Alliance recently released a short animated video, Farm On: Sustainable Food Production, and educational infographics highlighting sustainable farming and ranching practices. The educational media focus on sustainability in water, soil, air and habitat. The release builds on the USFRA’s ongoing effort to help consumers better understand agriculture.

    “Sustainability is a vital part of our everyday lives as farmers and ranchers, and we know consumers care about the environment when it comes to how food is grown and raised,” said CEO Randy Krotz. “Since not every consumer has the opportunity to see farming first-hand, our goal is to bring the farm to them. We hope watching this video and sharing these infographics gives people a glimpse into the practices that farmers and ranchers created and adopted to grow safe, nutritional and sustainable food. Along with this approach, farmers and ranchers carry a deep-rooted pride in environmental stewardship, knowing how we farm today impacts generations to come.”

    The video explains some of the complex ideas that technology has brought to agriculture, including:

    • Precision agriculture: farming tools like GPS to help plant seeds and apply fertilizer in the right place and in just the right amount
    • Advanced seeds: the ability to grow more crops on less land and utilize the seeds’ strength to fight off certain pests
    • Advanced monitoring tools: the ability to monitor animals to ensure health and safety
    • Water conservation: irrigation systems to ensure a precise amount of water application and usage

    The infographics help define the terms and the social contract around farming, including:

    • Consumer perceptions around sustainability and farming: results revealing consumer perception around sustainability and how food is grown and raised
    • Pillars of sustainability: what farmers and ranchers are doing to improve the water, soil, air and habitat on and around their land and animals
    • Sustainability: the definition of sustainability regarding farming and ranching
    • Technology, sustainability and continuous improvement: information demonstrating how farmers and ranchers are using technology to do more with less

    Watch the video: http://mfa.ag/2dNr9xB
    See the infographics: http://mfa.ag/2dzk3nD

  • Weed scientists at Southern Illinois University Carbondale recently announced confirmation of protoporphyrinogen oxidase (PPO) inhibitor resistance in Palmer amaranth. Illinois has become the third state behind Arkansas (2011) and Tennessee (2015) to confirm PPO inhibitor resistance.

    The SIU scientists in collaboration with weed scientists from the University of Illinois found three populations that showed control failure after treatment with PPO inhibitor active ingredients fomesafen or lactofen (Flexstar, Cobra). The study confirmed two-way herbicide resistance (PPO inhibitor and glyphosate) for weed populations in Cahokia and Collinsville, Ill. However, tests of several individual plants from one field allowed researchers to confirm the frequency of PPO resistance is at less than 20 percent of the population.

    The discovery of PPO-resistant Palmer amaranth in Illinois is not surprising, said SIU scientist Karla Gage. She said the combination of the common use of PPO herbicides, the rapid evolution of Palmer amaranth, and the known long-distance dispersal of Palmer amaranth seeds with the movement of birds and machinery, caused her and other researchers to anticipate the PPO-resistance.

    As for treating non-resistant Palmer amarath, Iowa State weed scientist Bob Hartzler said you already know the ropes. “The one thing we have going for us is that every corn and soybean field has waterhemp, so farmers have developed weed management programs targeting waterhemp. Programs that are effective on waterhemp should provide effective control of Palmer amaranth. That alone will make it hard for the weed to spread rapidly. However, Palmer amaranth is more aggressive and grows more rapidly than waterhemp. That reduces the window of opportunity to implement control tactics,” he said.

    A lot of waterhemp is already resistant to glyphosate (Roundup), and it is likely Palmer amaranth will carry that same resistance. Farmers need to develop diversified weed management programs that use multiple herbicide sites of action and include alternative management strategies to delay further selection of herbicide-resistant weeds.”

    In Illinois, one field with confirmed resistance is located less than a mile from a Palmer population that is thought to have been introduced by geese. The grower maintained the field in the Conservation Reserve Program (CRP) for more than a decade and often saw geese foraging throughout the field. Once the field was tilled and planted into soybeans, a sea of Palmer amaranth emerged. Gage said it is likely that the removal of the competing CRP vegetation allowed the dormant and newly deposited Palmer amaranth seeds to emerge from the seed bank. University of Missouri research shows that waterfowl, specifically ducks, can disperse Palmer amaranth seeds about 1,700 miles.

    Considering the confirmation of PPO-resistant Palmer amaranth in Illinois, how quickly the species evolves and how far the resistant seeds may travel, growers should design robust field management programs and assume that low-level resistance is already present. A robust program includes a diversity of herbicide modes of action within and between years, along with crop rotation and correct herbicide application timing.

  • Consumers will get the chance to vote on GMOs directly with their pocketbook as Okanagan Specialty Fruits’ nonbrowning Arctic apple has been given deregulated status by the USDA’s Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service. Arctic Fuji apples join the company’s Arctic Golden and Arctic Granny varieties, both of which use similar breeding technology to achieve non-browning fruit.

    The approval follows a review of OSF’s petition for extension by USDA/APHIS and the successful conclusion of a comment period that sought public feedback. In an announcement from USDA/APHIS, Michael J. Firko, APHIS Deputy Administrator, explained that “this determination of nonregulated status of [Arctic Fuji] apples is the most scientifically sound and appropriate regulatory decision.”

    In fruits, there are several factors that lead to browning: the phenolic content; an enzyme called polyphenol oxidase; and these compounds’ ability to mix. Arctic apples have been improved through reducing the enzyme polyphenol oxidase. The Arctic Advantage non- browning trait becomes apparent when an apple is sliced, bitten or bruised. The work was done without introducing novel genes to the trees.

  • Land prices continue their reluctant decline in much of the Midwest. While anecdotal and isolated reports of farmland sales remind us that prices are variable by situation and location, the consensus among private lenders and Federal Reserve Banks is continued softening for ag real estate.

    “Over the past 12 months, farm prices have fallen by 11 percent, cattle prices are off by 22 percent, and grain prices are down by 20 percent.  Weak agricultural commodity prices are pushing farm income lower and sinking the overall Rural Mainstreet economy,” said Ernie Goss, Jack A. MacAllister Chair in Regional Economics at Creighton University’s Heider College of Business.

    Goss reported that in his August 2016 survey, bankers estimated, on average, farmland prices would fall by another 6.9 percent over the next 12 months. However, as in previous months, there is a great deal of variation across the region in the direction and magnitude of farmland prices, with prices growing in some portions of the region.

    Bank CEOs reported an average annual cash rent per acre of $252 with almost one-fourth of bankers detailing annual cash rents exceeding $299. Goss surveys bankers from Colorado, Illinois, Iowa, Kansas, Minnesota, Missouri, Nebraska, North Dakota, South Dakota and Wyoming.

    In late summer, University of Missouri economist Ron Plain released an annual opinion survey for Missouri land prices. Respondents were mostly lenders and rural appraisers. Some of the variability in value direction for land was evident in the responses.

    “Respondents reported the value of good cropland was up in 10 of the 20 areas of the state, but the statewide average of $4,677 per acre was down $59 or 1.3 percent below last year,” Plain reported. The survey showed pasture land sliding 3 percent on average with timberland holding steady. Recreational real estate was up $24 per acre on average.

    Respondents in the University of Missouri survey commented that low cattle and crop prices had pressured land prices lower, but consistently low-interest rates have slowed the decline. When asked what they expected for the coming 12 months, respondents in the survey predicted cropland values to fall another 3.3 percent and pasture land values to slide by 2.3 percent.

    The eastern portion of MFA’s trade territory is included in the Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis, which performs an agricultural survey each quarter. Its second-quarter survey showed cash rents for ranch and pastureland sliding by 20.7 percent compared to last year, but just 2.2 percent from the first quarter of 2016. Respondents in that survey said second-quarter values for good cropland values remained relatively steady compared to a year-over-year decline of 6.4 percent. Still, the majority of respondents look for continued downward pressure on land prices over the next three months.

    At the Kansas City Federal Reserve, assistant vice president Nathan Kauffman said that second quarter survey results were similar in the western side of MFA’s territory.

    “Weakening farm income and deteriorating credit conditions continued to pressure farmland values lower. Values of nonirrigated and irrigated cropland declined 3 percent and 5 percent, respectively, from a year ago. Ranchland values also declined 3 percent, continuing the downward trend of recent quarters,” reported Kauffman.

    The KC Fed survey showed that similar to other regions, there is variability on land values depending on agricultural uses and geographically specific economic factors.

    “Declines in cropland values were most significant in Kansas and Oklahoma, likely due to sustained weakness in profit margins associated with wheat and cattle production and potential spillover effects from difficulties in the energy sector. The declines in Kansas cropland values were, in fact, the largest year-over-year declines in any state [of the Fed’s 10th District] during the downturn of the past two years. Cropland values in Nebraska fell for an eighth consecutive quarter, and the 5 percent decrease in irrigated cropland values for the District was the largest decrease in 29 years,” reported Kauffman.

    The KC Fed survey collected similar sentiment from respondents about land prices in the near term. More than 30 percent of banker respondents expect the values of all types of farmland to decline in the next quarter while less than 2 percent expect an increase. And most of them agreed that the overall level of farm wealth is the driving factor.

    One thing to watch according to Kauffman: “Bankers also expect farm income to have a more significant effect this year in the adjustment of farmland values than in previous years, suggesting that reductions in cash flow may continue to weigh on farmland values.”  

  • Amendment #1 will appear on the November ballot here in Missouri, and voting for this important measure will help protect your farm from erosion and help fund Missouri Parks. Voting yes on Amendment #1 should feel as good for Missouri farmers as a hot shower after a day working outside during a Missouri summer. Think about it. By the time you get to Amendment #1 on the ballot, you’ll have listened to and watched months of negative advertising, seen a debate or two, worried about the economy and low farm prices and even, if you’re like me, wished that we picked some of our candidates by lottery instead of the way we do it. Heck, by the time you get to the bottom of the ballot and the end of the season, you’ll be ready for a shower to wash the grime of the long campaign season off. Then, you get a chance to vote to save Missouri soils and improve Missouri parks.

    We get the opportunity to do this every 10 years, and voting yes means we’ll leave the polling place knowing that at least one vote we cast will make things better. That’s something that only happens once a decade, and it is a very good feeling.

    When the measure was introduced in the early 1980s, Missouri led the nation in per-acre soil erosion. We’ve made more progress than any state and have cut erosion rates in half. We’ve saved hundreds of millions of tons of soil, protected Missouri lakes and streams, and improved the productivity of our farms. That’s a government program with measurable results, which is as rare as a summer with perfect weather.

    The program works because we vote on it every 10 years, which means that we have to show results or voters will show their disapproval. The program works because it is primarily administered at the local level, where the people responsible for spending the money know what’s happening with the money they spend. (Half of the funds generated by the program, a one-tenth-of-a-cent sales tax, go to the state parks system and half go to soil and water conservation programs.) The program works because farmers are responsible for cost share funds, meaning we have skin in the game. Farmers, like everyone else, spend their own money more carefully than they spend other people’s money. Finally, the program works because it is simple, with easily understood and measurable goals. Our park and soils program can and should serve as an example for public programs in every state.

    As I’ve listed the reasons why the program works and talked about why I think you should vote yes, it occurs to me that I haven’t completely explained the reason why I’ll vote yes, which is much more personal, wrapped up in my memories of my grandfather. Charles T. Hurst was careful with a dollar. Once, in the 1980s, when we were removing a fence to repair a diversion terrace, I asked him how old the wire was. He admitted he didn’t know. You see, the wire was already used when he installed it in 1935. You may ask why we were saving the wire: Well-used wire is perfect for water gaps that might have to be replaced.

    But Grandpa would spend money on saving soil. I can remember driving out to his tractor to take him home, well after dark, while he was building terraces on the first farm I rented. He was in his 80s, and my grandmother was saving supper and ready for him to come in. His pride as a farmer was to make the land better. I can do no less, and like most farmers in Missouri, have been able to do much more to improve my farm because of our parks and soils program.

    As farmers, we’re under more scrutiny to be good stewards of the soil and water. For the first time ever, we’re being asked to meet conservation goals in order to qualify for crop insurance. Missouri farmers have a huge advantage in meeting those regulations because Missouri voters are our partner in soil conservation. As citizens, as farmers, as stewards of the land, we can continue this valuable partnership by voting yes on Amendment #1 on Nov. 8.

Featured IN THIS ISSUE

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
Prev Next

In this November 2016 Issue

04-11-2016 Hits:268 Feature TF staff - avatar TF staff

In this November 2016 Issue

What’s up with conservation?Steady effort gets resultsby Nancy Jorgensen (related story:Have you applied for Conservation funding?) Notice of MFA Incorporated annual meeting (Click to see) Act now to manage your tax liabilityExpecting less profit...

Read more

Act now to manage your tax liability

01-11-2016 Hits:294 Feature Nancy Jorgensen - avatar Nancy Jorgensen

Act now to manage your tax liability

“Lower crop and livestock prices mean earnings will be down,” said Joe Koenen, an agricultural business specialist for the Northeast region of the University of Missouri’s Extension Service. “Start gathering...

Read more

Farming for Sustainability

01-11-2016 Hits:201 Blog TF Staff - avatar TF Staff

U.S. Farmers & Ranchers Alliance recently released a short animated video, Farm On: Sustainable Food Production, and educational infographics highlighting sustainable farming and ranching practices. The educational media focus on...

Read more

Magazine

  • Subscriptions
  • Advertising
  • This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.

Support

  • This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.
  • FAQ
  • Copyright Notice